Contraceptive choices and social vulnerability among women of reproductive age

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26694/reufpi.v15i1.6979

Keywords:

Contraception, Reproductive Health, Sexual Health, Contraceptives

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the prevalence and predictive factors associated with the use of contraceptive methods among women of reproductive age managed at a municipal healthcare service. Methods: A quantitative, cross-sectional study conducted at two units of the Florescer Service through the administration of a research questionnaire. Sociodemographic variables, gynecological and obstetric history, sexual behavior, and contraceptive use were analyzed. Data analysis was performed using the Chi-square test with a 5% significance level. Results: A 61% prevalence of contraceptive method use was identified among women of reproductive age, with the oral contraceptive pill (22.6%) and the condom (16.6%) being the most frequently used; 31% of the women who participated in the study did not use any contraceptives, and among non-users, the majority had completed only primary education. Having regular menstrual cycles and having one or more sexual partners emerged as predictive factors for contraceptive use. Conclusion: The study identified a significant association between the use of contraceptive methods and factors such as menstrual cycle regularity and number of sexual partners, demonstrating the influence of biological and behavioral factors on contraceptive choices, while highlighting the role of social vulnerability conditions as an intervening variable.

Author Biographies

Larissa Forte Lima Faria , Federal University of Piauí

Nurse from the Federal University of Piauí. Teresina, Piauí, Brazil.

Mariana de Sousa Ferreira , Universidade Federal do Piauí

Graduated in Nursing from the Federal University of Piauí - UFPI, Postgraduate student in Obstetrics at UniEducacional. Teresina, Piauí, Brazil.

Luíza Alves da Silva, Universidade Federal do Piauí

Universidade Federal do Piauí. Programa de Pós-graduação em Enfermagem- PPGENF-UFPI, Teresina, Piauí, Brasil.

Jaqueline Carvalho e Silva Sales , Federal University of Piauí

Bachelor's degree in Nursing from the UNINOVAFAPI University Center. Specialist in Collective Health and Family Health. Master's and Doctorate in Nursing from the Federal University of Piauí. Lecturer in the Nursing Department at the Federal University of Piauí. Vice-coordinator and lecturer of the Postgraduate Program in Family Health at the Northeast Family Health Training Network. Teresina, Piauí, Brazil. 

Lívia Carvalho Pereira, Federal University of Piauí

Bachelor's degree in Nursing from the Federal University of Piauí. Specialist in Public Health with an emphasis on Family Health. Specialist in Obstetric Nursing - Stork Network. Master's in Nursing from the Federal University of Piauí-UFPI. PhD in Collective Health from the Postgraduate Program in Child and Women's Health - Fernandes Figueira Institute. Full professor at the Nursing Department of the Federal University of Piauí - UFPI. Professor of the Postgraduate Program in Nursing. Teresina, Piauí, Brazil. 

References

1. World Health Organization. Sexual Health, Human Rights and the Iris Law. 88p. [Internet]. 2020.

2. Parmejiani EP, Queiroz ABA, Pinheiro AS, Cordeiro EM, Moura MAV, Paula MBM. Sexual and reproductive health in riverine communities: integrative review. Rev. Esc. de Enferm USP. 2021;55. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1980-220X2019033103664

3. Paiva CCN, Caetano R. Avaliação de implantação das ações de saúde sexual e reprodutiva na Atenção Primária: revisão de escopo. Esc Anna Nery [Internet]. 4:e20190142. DOI: 10.1590/2177-9465-EAN-2019-0142

4. Carreno I, Dias-da-Costa JS, Olinto MTA, Meneghel S. Uso de métodos contraceptivos entre mulheres com vida sexual ativa em São Leopoldo, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Cad Saúde Pública. 2006 May;22(5):1101–9. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2006000500023

5. Protocolo Clínico e Diretrizes Terapêuticas para Atenção Integral às Pessoas com Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis (IST) — Português (Brasil) [Internet]. www.gov.br. Available from: https://www.gov.br/aids/pt-br/centrais-de- conteudo/pcdts/2022/ist/pcdt-ist-2022_isbn-1.pdf/view.

6. Brandão ER, Cabral, CS. Juventude, gênero e justiça reprodutiva: iniquidades em saúde no planejamento reprodutivo no Sistema Único de Saúde. Cien Saúde Colet [online]. 2021, v. 26, n., pp. 2673-2682. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232021267.08322021

7. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE). Censo Demográfico 2022: resultados da população e dos domicílios do Brasil [Internet]. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE; 2023 [cited 2025 jul 11]. Available from: https://censo2022.ibge.gov.br

8. de Lima Queji AM. Direitos reprodutivos: uma análise crítica do acesso a esse direito para mulheres em vulnerabilidade social no Brasil. Avant [Internet]. 1º de outubro de 2024 [cited 2025 jul 11];8(1):185–201. Available from: https://ojs.sites.ufsc.br/index.php/avant/article/view/7360

9. National Survey of Demography and Health of Children and Women PNDS 2006 Dimensions of the Reproductive Process and Child Health [Internet]. 2009. Available from: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/pnds_crianca_mulher.pdf.

10. Ewerling F, Victora CG, Raj A, Coll CVN, Hellwig F, Barros AJD. Demand for family planning satisfied with modern methods among sexually active women in low- and middle-income countries: who is lagging behind? Reproductive Health. 2018 Mar 6;15(1). DOI: 10.1186/s12978-018-0483-x

11. Melo CRM, Borges ALV, Duarte LS, Nascimento NC. Contraceptive use and the intention to become pregnant among women attending the Brazilian Unified Health System. Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem. 2020;28:e3328. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.3451.3328.

12. Trindade RE da, Siqueira BB, Paula TF de, Felisbino-Mendes MS. Uso de contracepção e desigualdades no planejamento reprodutivo das mulheres brasileiras. Ciência saúde coletiva [Internet]. 2021;26:3493–504. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232021269.2.24332019

13. Trindade RE, Siqueira BB, Paula TF, Felisbino-Mendes MS. Uso de contracepção e desigualdades do planejamento reprodutivo das mulheres brasileiras. Cien Saúde Colet [Internet]. 2021;26(suppl 2):3493–504. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232021269.2.24332019

14. Cahill N, Sonneveldt E, Stover J, et al. Modern contraceptive use, unmet need, and demand satisfied among women of reproductive age who are married or in a union in the focus countries of the Family Planning 2020 initiative: a systematic analysis using the Family Planning Estimation Tool. Lancet. 2018;391(10123):870-882. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33104-5

15. Ruivo ACO, Facchini LA, Tomasi E, Wachs LS, Fassa AG. Disponibilidade de insumos para o planejamento reprodutivo nos três ciclos do Programa de Melhoria do Acesso e da Qualidade da Atenção Básica: 2012, 2014 e 2018. Cad Saúde Pública. 2021;37(6). https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00123220

16. Cabral C da S. Articulações entre contracepção, sexualidade e relações de gênero. Saúde e Sociedade [Internet]. 2017 https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-12902017000001

17. Ponce de Leon RG, Ewerling F, Serruya SJ, et al. Contraceptive use in Latin America and the Caribbean with a focus on long-acting reversible contraceptives: prevalence and inequalities in 23 countries. Lancet Glob Health. 2019;7(2):e227-e235. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30481-9

18. Sully EA, Biddlecom AS, Darroch JE. Not all inequalities are equal: differences in coverage across the continuum of reproductive health services. BMJ Glob Health. 2019;4(5):e001695. Published 2019 Sep 3. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001695.

Published

2026-08-19

How to Cite

1.
Faria LFL, Ferreira M de S, Silva LA da, Sales JC e S, Pereira LC. Contraceptive choices and social vulnerability among women of reproductive age. Rev Enferm UFPI [Internet]. 2026 Aug. 19 [cited 2026 Aug. 22];15(1). Available from: https://periodicos.ufpi.br/index.php/reufpi/article/view/6979

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)