Fatores relacionados à qualidade de vida no trabalho em universidade brasileira durante a pandemia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26694/reufpi.v15i1.8451Palavras-chave:
Qualidade de vida, Trabalho, Universidades, Setor público, Servidores públicosResumo
Objetivo: identificar os fatores relacionados à qualidade de vida no trabalho de servidores públicos de uma universidade durante a pandemia de COVID-19. Métodos: pesquisa transversal, exploratória e observacional, realizada com 253 servidores públicos de uma universidade brasileira entre abril e agosto de 2021. Aplicou-se questionário online para avaliação de dados sociodemográficos, de saúde e de trabalho, além da escala Quality of Working Life Questionnaire-Bref. Realizaram-se os testes qui-quadrado de Pearson, exato de Fisher, U de Mann-Whitney e Kruskall-Wallis, considerando-se significativos os achados com valor de p inferior a 0,05. Resultados: 91,7% dos servidores obtiveram nível satisfatório/muito satisfatório de qualidade de vida no trabalho (QVT). O domínio pessoal obteve melhor pontuação (70,32; x=3,80; DP=0,62). A faixa etária (p<0,046), a renda (p<0,038), o estilo de vida e aspectos laborais estiveram relacionados a melhor avaliação de QVT, com destaque para satisfação com o trabalho (p<0,001), ausência de tabagismo (p<0,017) e comprometimento excessivo (p<0,001). O domínio profissional apresentou menor escore (57,95; x=3,31; DP=0,68), sinalizando necessidade de investigação. Conclusão: apesar de todas as questões associadas à pandemia, a QVT dos servidores foi considerada satisfatória/muito satisfatória, estando relacionada a alguns fatores sociodemográficos, hábitos de vida, aspectos de saúde e laborais, denotando maior atenção no domínio profissional.
Referências
1.World Health Organization (WHO). Guidelines on mental health at work. Geneva: World Health Organization, Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. ISBN 978-92-4-005305-2; 2022. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240053052
2. Ayalew AF, Ma W, Tamir W, Mitiku K. Quality of work life and associated factors among health professionals working at private and government health institutions in Awi zone, Amhara regional state, Ethiopia, 2022: a comparative cross-sectional study. Front Public Health. [Internet]. 2024;12,1377145:1-10. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1377145
3. González-Caballero J. Assuming the Challenge of Developing Research Projects in Occupational Health Nursing. Med Lav. [Internet]. 2023;114(2)e2023018:1-5. doi: 10.23749/mdl.v114i2.14247
4. Pilatti LE, Santos CB, Lievore C, Picinin CL. Qualidade de vida no trabalho (QVT) no Brasil: revisão narrativa. Rev Bras Qual Vida. [Internet]. 2023;15,e16376:1-29. doi: 10.3895/rbqv.v14n0.16376
5. Atz MV, Remor E. Psychosocial factors associated with ao Healthy Lifestyle in University Public Workers. Rev Psicol Divers Saúde. [Internet]. 2022;11,e4033:1-16. doi: https://doi.org/10.17267/2317-3394rpds.2022.e4033
6. Alves CM, Morais C, Alves F, Magalhães D, Gonçalves G, Brito I. Community-Based Action Research Intervention to Promote Occupational Health Nursing of Portuguese Quarry Workers Nurs Rep. [Internet]. 2024;14(1):390–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep14010030
7. Lira JCG Neto, Sáber AJG, Roza MP, Freitas MBT, Grifante L, Fernandes BKC, Penha JC. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the education and health of university students. Rev Enferm UFPI. [internet] 2024;13:e5016. doi: 10.26694/reufpi.v13i1.5016
8. Silva RRV, Barbosa REC, Souza e Silva NS. Pinho L, et al. COVID-19 pandemic: dissatisfaction with work among teachers in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Cienc Saude Colet. [Internet]. 2021;26(12):6117-28.
9. Moura DCA, Greco RM, Paschoalin HC, Portela LF, Arreguy-Sena C, Chaoubah A. Psychological demand and control of the work process of public university servants. Cien Saude Colet. [Internet]. 2018;23(2):481-90. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232018232.13892015
10. Cheremeta M, Pedroso B, Pilatti LA, Kovaleski JL. Construção da versão abreviada do QWLQ-78: um instrumento de avaliação da qualidade de vida no trabalho. Rev Bras Qual Vida. [Internet]. 2011;3(1):1-15. doi: 10.3895/S2175-08582011000100001
11. Reis Junior DR, Pilatti LA, Pedroso B. Qualidade de vida no trabalho: construção e validação do questionário QWLQ-78. Rev Bras Qual Vida. [Internet]. 2011;3(2):1-12. doi: 10.3895/S2175-08582011000200001
12. Silva LS, Barreto SM. Transcultural adaptation into Brazilian Portuguese of the effort-reward imabalance scale: a study with bank workers. Rev Panam Salud Publica. [Internet]. 2010; 27(1):32–6.
13. Valencia-Contrera M, Rivera-Rojas F. Bibliometric analysis of scientific production in occupational health nursing. Rev Bras Med Trab. [Internet]. 2023;21(4)e20231135:1-7. doi: http://doi.org/10.47626/1679-4435-2023-1135
14. Hecker J, Freijer K, Hiligsmann M, Evers SMAA. Burden of disease study of overweight and obesity; the societal impact in terms of cost-of-illness and health-related quality of life. BMC Public Health. [Internet]. 2022;22(1)46:1-13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12449-2
15. Xu Y, Jie D, Wu H, Shi X, Badulescu D, Akbar S, et al. Reducing Employee Turnover Intentions in Tourism and Hospitality Sector: The Mediating Effect of Quality of Work Life and Intrinsic Motivation. Int. J. Environ. Res Public Health. [Internet]. 2022;19(18)11222:1-18. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811222
16. Gon Y, Ohyanagi N, Kobayashi A. The association between control level and selfreported treatment adherence across diferente treatment types in Japanese asthma patients. Respir Investig. [Internet]. 2021;59(4):454-63. doi:10.1016/j.resinv.2021.02.003
17. Malfa CS, Karaivazoglou K, Assimakopoulos K, Gourzis P, Vantarakis A. Psychological Distress and Health-Related Quality of Life in Public Sector Personnel. Int J Environ Res Public Health. [Internet]. 2021;18(4)1865:1-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041865
18. Ashri MHM, Saad HA, Adznam SN. Factors Associated with Health-Related Quality of Life among Government Employees in Putrajaya, Malaysia. Int J Environ Res Public Health. [Internet]. 2021;18(5)2626:1-17. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052626
19. Pereira D, Leitão J, Ramos L. Burnout and Quality of Work Life among Municipal Workers: Do Motivating and Economic Factors Play a Mediating Role? Int J Environ Res Public Health. [Internet]. 2022;19(20)13035:1-17. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192013035
20. Kato T, Baba K, Guo W, Chen Y, Nosaka T. Impact of bipolar disorder on health-related quality of life and work productivity: Estimates from the national health and wellness survey in Japan. J Affect Disord. [Internet]. 2021;295(1):203–14. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.07.104
21. Ribeiro BMSS. Occupational nursing during disasters from the perspective of holistic theory. Rev Bras Med Trab. [Internet]. 2024;22(1)e2021910:1-5. doi: http://doi.org/10.47626/1679-4435-2021-91018.
22. Sticca MG, Damasceno TY, Silva FHM, Santos VM. Psychosocial factors in the work of public servants relocated from function. Rev Bras Orientaç Prof. [Internet]. 2023;24(1):43-55. doi: https://doi.org/10.26707/1984-7270/2023v24n0105
23. Pinto MJS, Tonin LA, Hortense P. The Health and Safety Policy for Federal Public Servants and the Integrated Health Care Subsystem for Federal Public Servants: Contributions to the Sustainable Development Goals. Rev Bras Saude Ocup. [Internet]. 2025;50:eddsst14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/2317- 6369/28124pt2025v50eddsst14
24. Mohammad A, Silva PM, Al Hosani S, Al Jabri O, Al Yafel Z, Datta S, et al. Health and Wellness Characteristics of Employees Enrolled in a Workplace Wellness Study in the United Arab Emirates: A Descriptive Analysis of a Pilot Study. Cureus. [Internet]. 2024;16(6)e62294:1-14. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62294
25. Justino AS, Cardoso OO, Sousa RA, Lima MS. Teachers’ perception of health, remote work, and the students’ situation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Rev Enferm UFPI. [internet]. 2024;13:e4694. doi: 10.26694/reufpi.v13i1.4694
26. Gomes V, Gomes A, Motta OJR. Occupational Risks at Work and Occupational Health Policies in Federal Education Institutions. Vittalle. [Internet]. 2022;34(1):93-102. doi: https://doi.org/10.14295/vittalle.v34i1.13717
27. Godinho MR, Ferreira AP, Moura DCA, Greco RM. Social Support at Work: a cohort study with civil servants from a public university. Rev Bras Epidemiol. [Internet]. 2019;22e190068:1-13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-549720190068
28. Adriani PA, Hino P, Taminato M, Fernandes H. Construction of educational technology on non-violent communication between health professionals: an experience report. Rev Bras Enferm. [Internet]. 2023;76(Suppl 4):e20220414. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2022-0414p
29. Berglund E, Anderzén I, Andersén A, Lindberg P. Work-life balance predicted work ability two years later: a cohort study of employees in the Swedish energy and water sector. BMC Public Health. [Internet]. 2021;21(1)1212:1-12. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11235-4
30. Bartlett L, Martin AJ, Kilpatrick M, Otahal P, Sanderson K, Neil AL. Effects of a Mindfulness App on Employee Stress in an Australian Public Sector Workforce: Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. [Internet]. 2022;10(2)e30272:1-18. doi: 10.2196/30272
31. García-Rodríguez R, Vázquez-Rodríguez A, Bellahmar-Lkadiri S, Salmonte-Rodríguez A, Siverio-Díaz AR, De Paz-Pérez P, et al. Effectiveness of a Nurse-Led Telehealth Intervention to Improve Adherence to Healthy Eating and Physical Activity Habits in Overweight or Obese Young Adults. Nutrients. [Internet]. 2024;16(14)2217:1-12. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16142217
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2026 Revista de Enfermagem da UFPI
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à REUFPI o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attibution BY 4.0 que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
