Rawls e a justificação coerentista em Ética
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26694/pensando.v2i3.571Palabras clave:
Rawls, coerentismo, ética, justificaçãoResumen
Buscarei neste artigo examinar alguns aspectos da filosofia de Rawls ligados ao problema da justificação na ética. Apresentaremos inicialmente a importância do tema da justificação e veremos os traços principais do que normalmente é chamado de argumento coerentista. Depois, sugeriremos que a metodologia rawlsiana oscila entre uma abordagem objetivista (cognitivista) e uma subjetivista (não-cognitivista), sendo marcada, nos dois casos, por um intuicionismo mitigado. A estratégia rawlsiana encontra-se sujeita às críticas que podem ser feitas ao intuicionismo, em especial, que seu coerentismo é vítima do relativismo. Um esboço de resposta rawlsiana a esta crítica será oferecido, porém.
Citas
BONELLA, Alcino E. 1995. Moral deontológica e princípio de universalização. Campinas, Unicamp (Dissertação de Mestrado).
_______ 2000. Justiça como Imparcialidade e Contratualismo. Campinas, UNICAMP (Tese).
_______ 2000 B. “Intuições, Princípios e Teorias nas Filosofias Morais de Rawls e Hare” DUTRA, L. H. A. & MORTARI, C. A. Princípios: seu papel na filosofia e nas ciências. Florianópolis, Ed. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina.
_______. 2005. “Fatos, Lógica e Moralidade”. In; DUTRA, Luiz Henrique &
MORTARI, César. Ética. Florianópolis, UFSC.
_______. 2004. “A Moralidade Demanda Prescrições Universais?” In: Etic@
An International Journal for Moral Philosophy, Florianópolis, v. 3, n. 2, p. 135-143.
_______. 2006. “Conflicts, Language and Rationality”. In: GASSER, G. et alli. Cultures:
Conflict, Analysis, Dialog. Kirchberg am Wechsel, Austrian L. Wittgeinsteim Society.
_______ 2007. “Prescritivismo e Utilitarismo”. In; CARVALHO, Maria Cecília &
DALLAGNOL, Darlei. Utilitarismo e seus críticos. Florianópolis, UFSC. (no
prelo).
_______ 2011 “Identidade e Pessoalidade”. Ethic@ (UFSC), v. 8, 2009.
_______. 2011. "Biotechnology and the present of the human condition". In
DOMINGUES, Ivan. Biotechnology and the Future of Human Condition. BH,
UFMG, 2011.
_______. 2011. "Multiculturalismo e Igualdade". In: DIAS, Maria Clara. Filosofia da
mente, Ética e Metaética. RJ, UFRJ,
_______. 2011. "Racionalidade Prescritiva" in BUENO, Roberto, Justiça, Direito e
Racionalidade. Paraná, 2011 (no prelo).
BRANDT, Richard B. 1998. A Theory of The Good and Right (1979). Amherst, New York. Prometheus Books.
_______ 1995. Morality, Utilitarianism and Rights. Cambridge University Press.
_______ 1996. Facts, Values, and Morality. Cambridge University Press.
BROOME, John. Weighing Goods: Equality, Uncertainty and Time, Blackwell, 1991. Paperback 1995.
____. Ethics Out of Economics, Cambridge University Press, 1999.
____. Weighing Lives, Oxford University Press, 2004.
____. ‘Are intentions reasons? And how should we cope with incommensurable values?’, in Practical Rationality and Preference: Essays for David Gauthier, edited by
Christopher Morris and Arthur Ripstein, Cambridge University Press, 2001, pp.
–120.
_____. ‘Does rationality give us reasons?’, Philosophical Issues, 15 (2005), pp. 321–37.
____. ‘Have we reason to do as rationality requires? A comment on Raz’, Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy, 1 (2005).
____. ‘Wide or narrow scope?’, Mind, 116 (2007), pp. 359–70.
____. ‘Is rationality normative?’, Disputatio, 11 (2008), pp. 153–71.
DANCY, Johathan 1994. “Intuitionism”, In: Singer 1994.
DANIELS, Norman 1979. “Wide Reflective Equilibrium and Theoy of Acceptance in Ethics”. Journal of Philosophy 76: 256-282.
_______ 1989. Reading Rawls. Standford, Standford University Press.
_______ 1989, “Equal Liberty and Unequal Worth of Liberty”, In: Daneils 1989.
DWORKIN, Ronald 1989. “The original position”, in: DANIELS 1989.
_______ 1977. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge.-Massachussetts. Harvard Univ. Press.
_______ 1988. L’impact de la théorie de Rawls sur la pratique et la philosophie du droit. In: AUDARD 1998.
FRANKENA, William K. 1977. Ética. Rio de Janeiro, Zahar editores.
GRIFFIN, James 1988. Well-being, its Meaning, Measurement and Moral
Importance. Oxford, Claredom Press.
HAMPTON, Jean “Contracts and Choices: does Rawls have a social contract theory?”, Journal of Philosophy 77 (1980), 315-38.
_______ 1996. “Contract and Consent”, In: Goodin & Pettit 1996.
HARE, R. M. 1952. The language of morals. Oxford, Claredom Press.
_____ 1972. Practical Inferences. Edinburgh, Macmillan Press LTD.
_____ 1972, Essays on Philosophical Method. Idem.
_____ 1972, Essays on the Moral Concepts. Idem.
_____ 1972, Applications of Moral Philosophy. Idem.
_____ 1963. Freedom and Reason. Oxford, Clarendon Press.
_____ 1981. Moral Thinking, its levels, method and point. Oxford, Clarendon Press.
_____ 1988. “Comments”. In SEANOR 1988.
_____ 1989. Essays on Political Morality. Oxford, Clarendon Press.
_____ 1989, Essays in Ethical Theory. Oxford, Clarendon Press.
_____ 1992, Essays on Religion and Education. Oxford, Clarendon Press.
_____ 1993, Essays on Bioethics. Oxford, Clarendon Press.
_____ 1994, “Universal Prescriptivism” in: SINGER, Peter (edit.) A Companion to Ethics.
Oxford, Blackwell.
_____ 1997. Sorting out Ethics. Oxford, Claredom Press.
_____ 1998. “A Utilitarian Approach”. In: KUHSE, Helga & SINGER, Peter.
A Companion to Bioethics. Oxford, Blackwell.
_____ 1999, Objetictive Prescriptions. Oxford, Clarendon Press.
HARSANYI, John C. 1975. “Can the Maximin Principle Serve as Basis for Morality?”, The Amercian Political Science Review. 69 (2), pp. 594-606.
_______ 1982. “Morality and the Theory of rational behavior”, In: Sen & Williams 1982.
KYMLICKA, Will 1989. “Liberal Individualism and Liberal Neutrality”, Ethics 99, pp. 883-905.
_______ 1990. Contemporary Political Philosphy. Oxford, Claredom Press.
_______ 1994 “The social contract tradition”, in: SINGER 1994.
KUKATHAS & PETTIT 1990. Rawls, A Theory of Justice and its Critics, Standford-California, Standford University Press. (Tradução portuguesa: 1995. Rawls: uma teoria da justiça e seus críticos. Lisboa, gradiva).
LYONS, David 1972. Rawls versus Utilitarianism. The Journal of Philosphy LXIX, 435-445.
______ 1989. “Nature and Soundness of the Contract and Coherence Arguments”, In: Daniels 1989.
NAGEL, Thomas 1986. “Ethics”. In: The view from nowhere. Oxford University Press.
_____ 1989. “Rawls on Justice”. In: Daniels 1989.
_____ 1991. Equality and Partiality. Oxford University Press.
OLIVEIRA, Nythamar Fernandes de 1998. “Kant, Rawls e a Fundamentação de uma teoria da justiça”, In: Felipe, Sônia. Justiça. Florianópolis, UFSC, 1998.
RAWLS 1971, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge-Massachussetts, The Belknap Press of the Harvard University. (25. ed., 1995)
______ 1972. Reply to Lyons and Teitelman, in: The Journal of Philosophy. LXIX, 18, october 5.
______ 1990. Justice as Fairness, a briefer restatement. Cambridge-Massachussetts. Harvard University. (Mimeo.)
______ 1993, Political Liberalism New York, Columbia Univ. Press.
______ 1995. Introduction to the Paperback Edition. Political Liberalism. New York, Columbia Univ. Press.
______ 1995. Reply to Habermas. Political Liberalism. New York, Columbia Univ. Press.
______ 1999. The Law of Peoples. Cambridge-Massachussetts, Harvard University.
______ 1999. Collected Papers. Cambridge-Massachussets, Harvard University Press.
SCHNEEWIND, J. B. 1994. Modern Moral Philosophy. In: Singer 1994.
SINGER, Peter (ed.) 1994. A Companion to Ethics. Oxford, Blackwell.
VITA 1993, Álvaro de. Justiça Liberal. São Paulo: Paz e Terra.
____ 1998. A Justiça Igualitária e seus críticos. São Paulo, Usp. (Tese de Doutorado).
____ 1998. “Duas interpretações da motivação moral”, In: Felipe 1998.
