Application of advanced and smart wound dressings in acute and chronic wound management

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26694/reufpi.v14i1.6997

Keywords:

Wounds, Wound Healing, Wound Dressings

Abstract

Objective: To present modern and smart dressings used in the treatment of different types of wounds by analyzing the types of materials, their structure, mechanisms of action, functional properties, advantages, disadvantages, and the presentation of current research that points to their potential to improve the healing process. Methods: A search of Google Scholar and relevant databases, including ScienceDirect, Scopus, and MEDLINE (PubMed), was conducted to identify a large number of peer-reviewed articles. Results: Modern and smart wound dressings represent a significant shift in healthcare, offering numerous advantages over conventional methods. The advancement of modern therapeutic options presents a wide range of opportunities for developing a personalized approach to wound healing. Conclusion: A multidisciplinary approach and close collaboration between physicians, nurses, and biomedical engineers are the foundation for the future development of personalized therapeutic modalities for different types of acute and chronic wounds.

Author Biographies

Andrijana Ćorić, Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad

Andrijana Ćorić is a Master of Science in Nursing and a PhD student in the field of Nursing. She is also a medical student at the Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad.

Nemanja Gvozdenović, Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad

Nemanja Gvozdenović, MD, PhD is an Associate Professor and orthopedic surgeon at the Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad. He is actively engaged in clinical practice, teaching, and research, with a focus on musculoskeletal injuries, and advanced surgical techniques.

 

References

1. Hassan LA, Khalfa HM, Majeed AA. Regeneration of Damaged Epidermal and Neural Cells in Rats with Subcutaneous Wounds Injected with Platelet Rich Plasma and Multivitamins. NeuroQuantology. 2021;19(10):56–61. doi: https://doi.org/10.14704/nq.2021.19.10.NQ21157

2. Olutoye OO, Eriksson E, Menchaca AD, Kirsner RS, Tanaka R, Schultz G, et al. Management of Acute Wounds-Expert Panel Consensus Statement. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2024;13(11):553-83. doi: https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2023.0059

3. Tatarusanu SM, Lupascu FG, Profire BS, Szilagyi A, Gardikiotis I, Iacob AT, et al. Modern Approaches in Wounds Management. Polymers (Basel). 2023;15(17):3648. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15173648

4. Rashdan HRM, El-Naggar ME. Traditional and modern wound dressings—characteristics of ideal wound dressings. In: Antimicrobial Dressings. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2023. p. 21–42.

5. Ahmad N. In Vitro and In Vivo Characterization Methods for Evaluation of Modern Wound Dressings. Pharmaceutics. 2022;15(1):42. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15010042

6. Özcan Bülbül E, Okur ME, Üstündağ Okur N, Siafaka PI. Traditional and advanced wound dressings: physical characterization and desirable properties for wound healing. In: Natural Polymers in Wound Healing and Repair. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2022. p. 19–50.

7. Orlińska K, Komosińska-Vassev K, Olczyk K, Glaesel M, Olczyk P. Wound healing – characteristics of the ideal dressing. Ann Acad Med Siles. 2023;77:197–203. doi: https://doi.org/10.18794/aams/173203

8. Cullen B, Gefen A. The biological and physiological impact of the performance of wound dressings. Int Wound J. 2023;20(4):1292–303. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13960

9. Fu X, Zheng L, Wen X, Yin X. Functional hydrogel dressings for wound management: a comprehensive review. Mater Res Express. 2023;10(11):112001. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/acfb5c

10. Nuutila K, Eriksson E. Moist Wound Healing with Commonly Available Dressings. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2021;10(12):685–98. doi: https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2020.1232

11. Nguyen HM, Ngoc Le TT, Nguyen AT, Thien Le HN, Pham TT. Biomedical materials for wound dressing: recent advances and applications. RSC Adv. 2023;13(8):5509–28. doi: https://doi.org/10.1039/D2RA07673J

12. Sinha SN, Free B, Ladlow O. The art and science of selecting appropriate dressings for acute open wounds in general practice. Aust J Gen Pract. 2022;51(11):827–30. doi: https://doi.org/10.31128/AJGP-06-22-6462

13. Saramago P, Gkekas A, Arundel CE, Chetter IC, Martin BC, Hewitt C, et al. Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by secondary intention is not cost-effective. British Journal of Surgery. 2025;112(5):znaf077. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znaf077

14. Zhang C, Zhang S, Wu B, Zou K, Chen H. Efficacy of different types of dressings on pressure injuries: Systematic review and network meta-analysis. Nurs Open. 2023;10(9):5857–67. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1867

15. Patton D, Moore ZE, Boland F, Chaboyer WP, Latimer SL, Walker RM, et al. Dressings and topical agents for preventing pressure ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024;12(12):CD009362. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009362.pub4

16. Mirhaj M, Labbaf S, Tavakoli M, Seifalian AM. Emerging treatment strategies in wound care. Int Wound J. 2022;19(7):1934-1954. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13786

17. Rani Raju N, Silina E, Stupin V, Manturova N, Chidambaram SB, Achar RR. Multifunctional and Smart Wound Dressings—A Review on Recent Research Advancements in Skin Regenerative Medicine. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14(8):1574. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14081574

18. Ghasemi AH, Farazin A, Mohammadimehr M, Naeimi H. Fabrication and characterization of biopolymers with antibacterial nanoparticles and Calendula officinalis flower extract as an active ingredient for modern hydrogel wound dressings. Mater Today Commun. 2022;31:103513. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.103513

19. Kim DH, Min KH, Ki MR, Han Y, Lee M, Lee JH, et al. Porous and hydrophilic biosilica diatomite-embedded foam dressing: Advancing wound healing through enhanced absorption. J Ind Eng Chem. 2025. In press. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1226086X25003752 doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2025.05.052

20. Long Y, Liu X, Huang F, Peng L, Duan Y, Bai G, et al. Normal-pressure-prepared chitosan carbonate liquid dressing: Spontaneous transformation into a pure chitosan water-resistant film and enhanced wound repair. Carbohydr Polym. 2025;366:123805. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2025.123805

21. Huang F, Yang D, Bai G, Su D, Zhu Z, Long Y. Rapid, organic-solvent-free freeze-thaw fabrication of pure chitosan sponges for scalable potential wound dressing applications. Carbohydr Polym Technol Appl. 2025;10:100809. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carpta.2025.100809

22. Zhao J, Wang Y, Lu F, Hu E, Xie R, Lan G, et al. Development of an aligned nanofiber composite silk fibroin multilayer dressings: Accelerating wound healing and reducing scar formation. Int J Biol Macromol. 2025;310:143178. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.143178

23. Shahroudi S, Parvinnasab A, Salahinejad E, Abdi S, Rajabi S, Tayebi L. Efficacy of 3D-printed chitosan cerium oxide dressings coated with vancomycin-loaded alginate for chronic wounds management. Carbohydr Polym. 2025;349:123036. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2024.123036

24. Yusakul G, Jomrit J, Bacabac RG, Prasopthum A. 3D printed personalized wound dressings using a hydrophobic deep eutectic solvent (HDES)-formulated emulgel. RSC Adv. 2024;14(46):34175–91. doi: https://doi.org/10.1039/D4RA05456C

25. Sheng K, Zheng X, Ren J, Gao Y, Long J, Wang Z, et al. Cotton gauze fabricated with hydro-stable Zn-MOF enables hemostasis acceleration, antibacterial activity, and wound regeneration. Int J Biol Macromol. 2025;316:144654. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.144654

26. Tang N, Zheng Y, Jiang X, Zhou C, Jin H, Jin K, et al. Wearable Sensors and Systems for Wound Healing-Related pH and Temperature Detection. Micromachines (Basel). 2021;12(4):430. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/mi12040430

27. Arafa AA, Nada AA, Ibrahim AY, Sajkiewicz P, Zahran MK, Hakeim OA. Preparation and characterization of smart therapeutic pH-sensitive wound dressing from red cabbage extract and chitosan hydrogel. Int J Biol Macromol. 2021;182:1820–31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.05.167

28. Elkenawy NM, Karam HM, Aboul-Magd DS. Development of gamma irradiated SSD-embedded hydrogel dyed with prodigiosin as a smart wound dressing: Evaluation in a MDR infected burn rat model. Int J Biol Macromol. 2022;211:170–82. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.05.063

29. Wang J, Zhao C, Yang P, He H, Yang Y, Lan Z, et al. A multifunctional electronic dressing with textile-like structure for wound pressure monitoring and treatment. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2025;679:737–47. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2024.10.116

30. Li Y, Liu Y, Peng B, Li X, Fang T, Liu S, et al. Stretchable, conductive, breathable and moisture-sensitive e-skin based on CNTs/graphene/GelMA mat for wound monitoring. Biomater Adv. 2022;143:213172. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioadv.2022.213172

31. Hosseini SM, Abdouss M, Mazinani S, Soltanabadi A, Kalaee M. Modified nanofiber containing chitosan and graphene oxide-magnetite nanoparticles as effective materials for smart wound dressing. Compos B Eng. 2022;231:109557. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109557

32. Alven S, Peter S, Mbese Z, Aderibigbe BA. Polymer-Based Wound Dressing Materials Loaded with Bioactive Agents: Potential Materials for the Treatment of Diabetic Wounds. Polymers (Basel). 2022;14(4):724. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14040724

33. Pickles S, McAllister E, McCullagh G, Nieroba T. Quality improvement evaluation of postoperative wound dressings in orthopaedic patients. Int J Orthop Trauma Nurs. 2022;45:100922. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijotn.2022.100922

34. Tavakoli M, Labbaf S, Mirhaj M, Salehi S, Seifalian AM, Firuzeh M. Natural polymers in wound healing: From academic studies to commercial products. J Appl Polym Sci. 2023;140(22):1169. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/app.53910

35. Schiefer J, Andreae J, Fuchs P, Lefering R, Heidekrueger P, Schulz A, et al. Evaluation of Scar Quality after Treatment of Superficial Burns with Dressilk® and Suprathel®—In an Intraindividual Clinical Setting. J Clin Med. 2022;11(10):2857. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11102857

36. Li D, Liang R, Wang Y, Zhou Y, Cai W. Preparation of silk fibroin‐derived hydrogels and applications in skin regeneration. Health Sci Rep. 2024;7(8):e2295. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.2295

37. Ho TT, Tran HA, Doan VK, Maitz J, Li Z, Wise SG, et al. Natural Polymer‐Based Materials for Wound Healing Applications. Adv Nanobiomed Res. 2024;4(5):2300131. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/anbr.202300131

38. PREVOR. Dressilk® - Superficial wounds therapy [Internet]. Valmondois: PREVOR; [cited 2025 Jun 26]. Available from: https://www.dressilk.com/en/

39. Janssen AHJ. Promising results in wound care with a new rapid capillary action dressing: a case series study. Wounds Intl. [Internet]. 2021;12(3):20–5. Available from: https://woundsinternational.com/journal-articles/promising-results-wound-care-new-rapid-capillary-action-dressing-case-series-study/

40. Sleegers R. Gipstherapie bij een diabetisch hielulcus. Ned Tijdschr Diabetol. 2021;19(1):10–4. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12467-021-0613-x

41. Breitwieser M, Viaene D. Capillary pressure in wound dressings: an investigation on behalf of Protex Healthcare Ltd. [Internet]. IMETER MessSysteme & Protex Healthcare Ltd.; 2021 [cited 2025 Jun 29]. Available from: https://www.imeter.de/120VACUTEX2020eng

42. Holloway S, Bradbury S. Wound dressings. Surgery (Oxford). 2024;42(11):805–13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mpsur.2024.08.009

43. Alvarez OM, Granick MS, Reyzelman A, Serena T. A prospective, randomized, controlled, crossover study comparing three multilayered foam dressings for the management of chronic wounds. J Comp Eff Res. 2021;10(6):481–93. doi: https://doi.org/10.2217/cer-2020-0268

44. Chrysostomou D, Papanikolaou GE, Boshoff L, Mbele T, Pokorná A, Holubová A, et al. Uncovering the Advantages of Foam Dressings with Active Ingredients. Pharmaceuticals. 2025;18(6):768. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18060768

45. Minsart M, Vlierberghe S Van, Dubruel P, Mignon A. Commercial wound dressings for the treatment of exuding wounds: an in-depth physico-chemical comparative study. Burns Trauma. 2022;10:tkac024. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/burnst/tkac024

46. Isopencu G, Deleanu I, Busuioc C, Oprea O, Surdu V-A, Bacalum M, et al. Bacterial Cellulose—Carboxymethylcellulose Composite Loaded with Turmeric Extract for Antimicrobial Wound Dressing Applications. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(2):1719. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24021719

47. Solanki D, Vinchhi P, Patel MM. Design Considerations, Formulation Approaches, and Strategic Advances of Hydrogel Dressings for Chronic Wound Management. ACS Omega. 2023;8(9):8172–89. doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c06806

48. Shrestha S, Wang B, Dutta PK. Commercial Silver-Based Dressings: In Vitro and Clinical Studies in Treatment of Chronic and Burn Wounds. Antibiotics. 2024;13(9):910. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13090910

49. Arviansyah A, Puling IMDR, Ibrahim FZ, Augustin NMAF, Wilyanto SE, Wihastyoko HYL. Effectiveness and Safety of Aquacel Ag in Burn Injury Management: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trial. [Internet]. Teikyo Med J. 2023;46(09):8203–10. Available from: https://www.teikyomedicaljournal.com/article/effectiveness-and-safety-of-aquacel-ag-in-burn-injury-management-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis-of-randomized-controlled-trial

50. Moraes FCA de, Ferraz Barbosa B, Sepulvida D, Bordignon Barbosa C, Brochi LM, Figueroa ES, et al. Nile Tilapia Skin Xenograft Versus Silver-Based Dressings in the Management of Partial-Thickness Burn Wounds: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med. 2024;13(6):1642. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13061642

51. Chen K, Sivaraj D, Davitt MF, Leeolou MC, Henn D, Steele SR, et al. Pullulan‐Collagen hydrogel wound dressing promotes dermal remodelling and wound healing compared to commercially available collagen dressings. Wound Repair Regen. 2022;30(3):397–408. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/wrr.13012

52. 3M™. Fibracol™ Plus collagen wound dressing with alginate [Internet]. 3M; [cited 2025 Jun 30]. Available from: https://www.3m.com/3M/en_LB/p/d/v101264122/

53. Barrett JP, Raby E, Wood F, Coorey R, Ramsay JP, Dykes GA, et al. An in vitro study into the antimicrobial and cytotoxic effect of ActicoatTM dressings supplemented with chlorhexidine. Burns. 2022;48(4):941–51. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2021.09.019

54. Lee YJ, Park KS, Kim DY, Shim HS. Evaluating Effectiveness of Medical Grade Honey- Containing Alginate Dressing in Patients with Chronic Lower Extremity Wounds. J Wound Manag Res. 2021;17(3):178–86. doi: https://doi.org/10.22467/jwmr.2021.01557

55. Hossain ML, Lim LY, Hammer K, Hettiarachchi D, Locher C. Honey-Based Medicinal Formulations: A Critical Review. Applied Sciences. 2021;11(11):5159. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/app11115159

56. Polverino G, Russo F, D’Andrea F. Bioactive Dressing: A New Algorithm in Wound Healing. J Clin Med. 2024;13(9):2488. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13092488

57. Shi C, Wang C, Liu H, Li Q, Li R, Zhang Y, et al. Selection of Appropriate Wound Dressing for Various Wounds. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020;8:182. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00182

58. Britto EJ, Nezwek TA, Popowicz P, et al. Wound Dressings. [Updated 2024 Jan 23]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470199/

59. Bishop A. Factors influencing dressing choice in wound care: a discussion. British Journal of Nursing. 2023;32(Sup20):S12–20. doi: https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2023.32.Sup20.S12

60. Hutchinson K. The road to transforming wound care: Empowering clinicians and improving patient outcomes through education. Wounds UK. [Internet]. 2025;21(1):54–7. Available from: https://wounds-uk.com/journal-articles/the-road-to-transforming-wound-care-empowering-clinicians-and-improving-patient-outcomes-through-education/

61. Li M, Xia W, Khoong YM, Huang L, Huang X, Liang H, et al. Smart and versatile biomaterials for cutaneous wound healing. Biomater Res. 2023;27(1)87. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40824-023-00426-2

62. Ansari M, Darvishi A. A review of the current state of natural biomaterials in wound healing applications. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024;12:1309541. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2024.1309541

63. Kaya S, Derman S. Properties of Ideal Wound Dressing. Ankara Universitesi Eczacilik Fakultesi Dergisi. 2023;47(3):5–5. https://doi.org/10.33483/jfpau.1253376

64. Su L, Jia Y, Fu L, Guo K, Xie S. The emerging progress on wound dressings and their application in clinic wound management. Heliyon. 2023;9(12):e22520. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22520

65. Laurano R, Boffito M, Ciardelli G, Chiono V. Wound dressing products: A translational investigation from the bench to the market. Engineered Regeneration. 2022;3(2):182–200. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engreg.2022.04.002

66. Alberts A, Tudorache D-I, Niculescu A-G, Grumezescu AM. Advancements in Wound Dressing Materials: Highlighting Recent Progress in Hydrogels, Foams, and Antimicrobial Dressings. Gels. 2025;11(2):123. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/gels11020123

67. Pang Q, Yang F, Jiang Z, Wu K, Hou R, Zhu Y. Smart wound dressing for advanced wound management: Real-time monitoring and on-demand treatment. Mater Des. 2023;229:111917. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2023.111917

68. Wu X, Liu C, Jiang Y, Dai T, Zhang L, Wang J, et al. Coaxial Electrospun Polycaprolactone/Gelatin Nanofiber Membrane Loaded with Salidroside and Cryptotanshinone Synergistically Promotes Vascularization and Osteogenesis. Int J Nanomedicine. 2024;19:6519-6546. doi: https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S461141

69. Khan MUA, Stojanović GM, Hassan R, Anand TJS, Al-Ejji M, Hasan A. Role of Graphene Oxide in Bacterial Cellulose-Gelatin Hydrogels for Wound Dressing Applications. ACS Omega. 2023;8(18):15909-15919. doi: https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S46114110.1021/acsomega.2c07279

70. Naderi Gharahgheshlagh S, Latifi N, Ghadimi T, Hosseinpour Sarmadi V, Mousavi SA, Ghasemian M, et al. Investigation impact of PVA nanofibers collagen-coated containing the conditioned medium of adipose mesenchymal stem cells (hA MSCs) in third degree burn wound healing. Materials Today Communications. 2025;48:113289. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2025.113289

71. Emaminia A, Hashemnia M, Cheraghi H, Rezaei F. A novel esculin loaded bacterial nanocellulose wound dressing enhances cutaneous wound healing via modulation of inflammation, oxidative stress, and growth factor expression. Int J Biol Macromol. 2025;333:148810. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.148810

72. Vo DK, Trinh KTL. Advances in Wearable Biosensors for Wound Healing and Infection Monitoring. Biosensors (Basel). 2025;15(3):139. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/bios15030139

73. Pang Q, Yang F, Jiang Z, Wu K, Hou R, Zhu Y. Smart wound dressing for advanced wound management: Real-time monitoring and on-demand treatment. Mater Des. 2023;229:111917. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2023.111917

74. Barros Almeida I, Garcez Barretto Teixeira L, Oliveira de Carvalho F, Ramos Silva É, Santos Nunes P, Viana Dos Santos MR, et al. Smart Dressings for Wound Healing: A Review. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2021;34(2):1-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ASW.0000725188.95109.68

75. Wang Z, Ahn Y, Kwon S, Yu T, Dai Y, Walsh J, et al. Roll-To-Roll Production of Smart Dressings for Wound Monitoring. Adv Healthc Mater. 2025;14(27):e01998. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202501998

Published

2025-12-31

How to Cite

1.
Ćorić A, Gvozdenović N. Application of advanced and smart wound dressings in acute and chronic wound management. Rev Enferm UFPI [Internet]. 2025 Dec. 31 [cited 2026 Feb. 20];14(1). Available from: https://periodicos.ufpi.br/index.php/reufpi/article/view/6997

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.