Scoping protocol review: PRISMA-ScR guide refinement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26694/reufpi.v12i1.3062Palavras-chave:
Revisão, Métodos, Revisão da pesquisa por paresResumo
Objective: To clarify information about the PRISMA-ScR checklist and provide detailed guidance on items for improvement of the scoping review protocol. Methods: Literature review, with analysis of studies related to the topic, via the PubMed portal and the Joanna Briggs Institute website, in August 2022. A synthesis of the findings and recommendations for refinement of the method description were performed. Results: The analyzed material enabled the elaboration of recommendations for improvement of the protocol in seven items of PRISMA-ScR: Title, Summary, Objectives, Research, Selection of sources of evidence, Summary of results, and Expected results. Conclusion: By highlighting and clarifying the phases of the construction of the scoping review protocol, based on PRISMA ScR, we obtained the construction of a transparent and reproducible model.
Referências
Aromataris E, Munn Z, editors. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis [Internet]. 2020 [citado em 20 set. 2022]. Disponível em: http://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-20-01.
Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol [Internet]. 2005 [citado em 20 set. 2022]; 8(1):19–32. Disponível em: http://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616.
Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci [Internet]. 2010 [citado em 21 set. 2022]; 5(1):69. Disponível em: http://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69.
Peters MDJ, Godfrey CM, Khalil H, McInerney P, Parker D, Soares CB. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. Int J Evid Based Healthc [Internet]. 2015 [citado em 20 set. 2022]; 13(3):141–6. Disponível em: http://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000050.
Colquhoun HL, Levac D, O’Brien KK, Straus S, Tricco AC, Perrier L, et al. Scoping reviews: Time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. J Clin Epidemiol [Internet]. 2014 [citado em 21 set. 2022]; 67(12):1291–4. Disponível em: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.013.
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ [Internet]. 2021 [citado em 19 set. 2022]; 372. Disponível em: http://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Ann Intern Med [Internet]. 2018 [citado em 15 set. 2022]; 169(7):467–73. Disponível em: http://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien K, Colquhoun H, Kastner M, et al. A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol [Internet]. 2016 [citado em 19 set. 2022]; 16(1):15. Disponível em: http://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0116-4
Peters MDJ, Godfrey C, McInerney P, Khalil H, Larsen P, Marnie C, et al. Best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocols. JBI Evid Synth [Internet]. 2022 [citado em 10 set. 2022];20(4):953–68. Disponível em: http://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-21-00242
Barbosa Filho VC, Tricco AC. Scoping review: a relevant methodological approach for knowledge synthesis in Brazil’s health literature. Rev. bras. ativ. fís. saúde [Internet]. 2019 [citado em 12 set. 2022]; 24:1–6. Disponível em: http://doi.org/10.12820/rbafs.24e0082
Pollock D, Alexander L, Munn Z, Peters MDJ, Khalil H, Godfrey CM, et al. Moving from consultation to co-creation with knowledge users in scoping reviews: Guidance from the JBI Scoping Review Methodology Group. JBI Evid Synth [Internet]. 2022 [citado em 20 ago. 2022]; 20(4):969–79. Disponível em: http://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-21-00416
Peters MDJ, Marnie C, Tricco AC, Pollock D, Munn Z, Alexander L, et al. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evid Synth [Internet]. 2020 [citado em 20 ago. 2022];18(10):2119–26. Disponível em: http://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-20-00167
Peters MDJ, Godfrey C, McInerney P, Khalil H, Larsen P, Marnie C, et al. Best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocols. JBI Evid Synth [Internet]. 2022 [citado em 20 ago. 2022];20(4):953–68. Disponível em: http://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-21-00242.
Negreiros FD da S, Araújo AL de, Mattos SM, Moreira TR, Cestari VRF, Silva LMS da, et al. Digital technologies in the care of people with diabetes during the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review. Rev. Esc. Enferm. USP. [Internet]. 2021 [citado em 08 set. 2022]; 55:1–11. Disponível em: http://doi.org/10.1590/1980-220x-reeusp-2021-0295.
Peters MDJ, Marnie C. Nurse practitioner models of care in aged care: a scoping review protocol. JBI Evid Synth [Internet]. 2022 [citado em 08 set. 2022]; 20(8):2064–70. Disponível em: http://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-21-00286.
Piran CMG, Fonseca BS da, Dias JR, Shibukawa BMC, Rissi G, Higarashi IH, et al. Digital educational technology on HIV/AIDS for adolescents and young adults: a protocol of scope review. Online braz. j. nurs. [Internet]. 2022 [citado em 08 set. 2022]; 21(Suppl 1):e20226564. Disponível em: http://doi.org/10.17665/1676-4285.20226564.
Guimarães BR, Cruz de OC. Literaturas branca e cinzenta: uma revisão conceitual. Ci.Inf. [Internet]. 2008 [citado em 10 set. 2022]; 44(3):501–13. Disponível em: http://doi.org/10.18225/ci.inf..v44i3.1804.
Araújo WCO. Recuperação da informação em saúde. ConCI [Internet]. 2020 [citado em 08 set. 2022]; 3(2):100–34. Disponível em: http://doi.org/10.33467/conci.v3i2.13447.
Rethlefsen ML, Kirtley S, Waffenschmidt S, Ayala AP, Moher D, Page MJ, et al. PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews. J Med Libr Assoc [Internet]. 2021 [citado em 08 set. 2022];109(2):174–200. Disponível em: http://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2021.962
Cohen J. A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales. Educ Psychol Meas [Internet]. 1960 [citado em 08 set. 2022]; 20(1):37–46. Disponível em: http://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104
Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. New York: Chapman and Hall; 1991.
Institute Joanna Briggs. New JBI levels of evidence: developed by Joanna Briggs Institute Levels of Evidence and Grades of Recommendation Working Party. 2013.
Zarin W, Veroniki AA, Nincic V, Vafaei A, Reynen E, Motiwala SS, et al. Characteristics and knowledge synthesis approach for 456 network meta-analyses: a scoping review. BMC Med [Internet]. 2017 [citado em 12 set. 2022];15(1):3. Disponível em: http://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-016-0764-6
Minayo MCS. Introdução. In: Minayo MCS, Assis SG, Souza ES, editors. Avaliação por triangulação de métodos: Abordagem de Programas Sociais. 1ª ed. Rio de Janeiro: FIOCRUZ; 2005. p. 244.
Bardin L. Análise do Conteúdo. 1a. 70 E, editor. Lisboa; 2015. 288 p.
Silva PB, Mattos SM, De Araújo AL, Martins LL, De Oliveira LS, Marques SJS, et al. Autocuidado em saúde mental de profissionais da saúde durante a pandemia COVID-19 no Brasil: protocolo de revisão. Brazilian J Heal Rev [Internet]. 2021 [citado em 20 set. 2022]; 4(3):12579–86. Disponível em: http://doi.org/10.34119/bjhrv4n3-229
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2023 Rev Enferm UFPI
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à REUFPI o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attibution BY 4.0 que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
