RISCO, RACIONALIDADE E OS LIMITES DA PRECAUÇÃO
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26694/pensando.v3i6.989Palabras clave:
Risco, racionalidade, precauçãoResumen
O princípio da precaução (PP) vem sendo frequentemente invocado em discussões sobre os usos a serem feitos dos resultados de vários dos avanços tecnológicos recentes. Como tal, o PP se oferece como um princípio absoluto para decisões reguladoras de práticas que se apropriam de tais avanços tecnológicos. Porém, um dos problemas centrais do PP está em sua falta de clareza conceitual. O propósito central deste artigo é contribuir para tal esclarecimento. Diante disto, discutiremos o PP a partir de dois pontos de vista: um referente à racionalidade epistêmica; o outro referente à moralidade. Argumentaremos que compromissos relacionados a estes pontos de vista compõem o PP e, contrariamente à expressiva tendência na literatura contemporânea de interpretar o PP como obedecendo a uma lógica consequencialista de ações, tentaremos mostrar que o PP é um princípio que expressa um ideal deontológico. Por fim, consideraremos alguns problemas relacionados ao PP. Mais especificamente, argumentaremos que o PP incorpora ideais substantivos epistêmicos e morais, contrariamente à tendência disseminada entre defensores do mesmo, que sugerem que o PP é um princípio formal e trivial para invidíduos racionais e morais.
Citas
Adams, John (1995) Risk, London; NY: Routledge.
Ahteensuu, Marko (2004) ‘The Precautionary Principle in the Risk Management of Modern Biotechnology’, Science Studies, 17, 1: 57–65.
Bedau, Mark A. & Parke, Emily C. (2009) ‘The Precautionary Principle and Its Critics’, in The Ethics of Protocells, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Bodansky, Daniel (2004) ‘Deconstructing the Precautionary Principle’, in Caron, David D. & Scheiber, Harry N., Bringing New Law to Ocean Waters, Leiden: Brill.
Clarke, Steve (2005) ‘Future Technologies, Dystopic Futures and the Precautionary Principle’, Ethics and Information Technology, 7:121–126.
Clarke, Steve (2009) ‘New Technologies, Common Sense and the Paradoxical Precautionary Principle’ in Sollie, P. & Düwell, M. Evaluating New Technologies, Springer.
Clifford, William K. (1886) ‘The Ethics of Belief’, in Lectures and Essays, London: Macmillan and Co.
Commission (2000) Communication from the Commission on the Precautionary Principle, The Commission of the European Communities, Brussels.
Engelhardt Jr., H. Tristram, & Jotterand, Fabrice (2004) ‘The Precautionary Principle: A Dialectical Reconsideration’, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 29, 3: 301–312.
Giddens, Anthony (2009) The Politics of Climate Change, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Goklany, Indur M. (2001) The Precautionary Principle: A Critical Appraisal of Environment Risk Assessment, Washington D.C.: Cato Institute.
Hansson, Sven Ove (1997) ‘The Limits of Precaution’, Foundations of Science, 2: 293-306.
Harremoës, Poul & Gee, David & MacGarvin, Malcolm & Stirling, Andy & Keys, Jane & Wynne, Brian & Vaz, Sofia Guedes (2002) The Precautionary Principle in the 20th Century: Late Lessons from Early Warnings, London: Earthscan.
Harris, John (2007) Enhancing Evolution: The Ethical Case for Making Better People, Princeton, Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Harris, John & Holm, SØren (2002) ‘Extending Human Lifespan and the Precautionary Paradox’, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 355-368.
Harris, John & Holm, SØren (1999) ‘Precautionary Principle Stifles Discovery’, Nature 29, 400: 398.
Harsanyi, John C. (1976) ‘Can the Maximin Principle Serve as a Basis for Morality? A Critique of John Rawls’s Theory’, in his Essays on Ethics, Social Behavior, and Scientific Explanation, Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Hughes, Jonathan (2006) ‘How Not to Criticize the Precautionary Principle’, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 31:447–464.
James, William (1917) ‘The Will to Believe’, in Selected Papers on Philosophy, London: J. M. Dent & Sons Ltd. [1896]
James, William (1917) ‘The Sentiment of Rationality’, in Selected Papers on Philosophy, London: J. M. Dent & Sons Ltd.
Jeffrey, Richard (1965) The Logic of Decision, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Jensen, Karsten Klint (2002) ‘The Moral Foundation of The Precautionary Principle’, Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 15: 39–55.
John, Stephen (2010) ‘In Defence of Bad Science and Irrational Policies: An Alternative Account of the Precautionary Principle’, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 13: 3-18.
Jordan, Andrew & O’Riordan, Timothy (1995) ‘The Precautionary Principle, Science, Politics and Ethics’, Norwich: Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment.
Harman, Gilbert (1986) Change in View: Principles of Reasoning, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Manson, Neil A. (2002) ‘Formulating the Precautionary Principle’, Environmental Ethics, 24: 263-274.
Marchant, Gary E. (2001) ‘The precautionary principle: an “unprincipled” approach to biotechnology regulation’, Journal of Risk Research 4 (2), 143–157.
Marchant, Gary E. & Mossman, Kenneth L. (2004) Arbitrary and Capricious: The Precautionary Principle in the European Union Courts, Washington D.C.: AEI Press.
Nozick, Robert (1974) Anarchy, State, and Utopia, New York: Basic Books.
Peterson, Martin (2006) ‘The Precautionary Principle Is Incoherent’, Risk Analysis, 26, 3: 595-601.
Peterson, Martin (2007) ‘The Precautionary Principle Should not be Used as a Basis for Decision-making’, EMBO reports 8, 4: 305-308.
Raffensperge, Carolyn & Barrett, Katherine (2001) ‘In Defense of the Precautionary Principle’, Nature Biotechnology, 19: 811-812.
Rawls, John (1971) A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press, Harvard University Press.
Raz, Joseph (1975) Practical Reason and Norms, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Resnik, David B. (2003) ‘Is the Precautionary Principle Unscientific?’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological & Biomedical Sciences, 34: 329–344.
Resnik, Michael D. (1987) Choices: An Introduction to Decision Theory, Minneapolis; London: University of Minnesota Press.
Sandin, Per (2007) ‘Common-sense Precaution and Varieties of the Precautionary Principle’, in Lewens, T. Risk: Philosophical Perspectives, London: Routledge.
Sandin, Per (2006) ‘A Paradox Out of Context: Harris and Holm on the Precautionary Principle’, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 15: 175–183.
Savage, Leonard (1972) The Foundations of Statistics, New York: Dover. [1954]
Stich, Stephen P. (1978) ‘The Recombinant DNA Debate’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 7, 3: 187-205
Sunstein, Cass R. (2005) Laws of Fear: Beyond the Precautionary Principle, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
von Schomberg, René (2006) ‘The Precautionary Principle and its Normative Challenges’, in Fisher, E., Jones, J. & von Schomberg, R., Implementing the Precautionary Principle: Perspectives and Prospects, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
