The critical potential of goods in the Taylorian ethics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26694/pensando.vol16i38.6777Keywords:
Charles Taylor, critics, goods, conflict, articulationAbstract
The ethical-political dimension of Charles Taylor’s thought is grounded in an ontology of the human that is temporally constituted through the hierarchies embedded in the inseparable relationship between the self and goods. Taylor’s effort to integrate the fundamental—what he calls the “inescapable frameworks” of self-understanding – with the historically embedded sources that confer meaning to shared modes of existence seeks to preserve a substantive dimension, expressed through goods, while simultaneously enabling new forms of practical engagement. Within this dynamic, inherently conflictual relationship lies the critical potential of goods in Taylorian ethics. Rather than advancing a procedural regulatory ideal, Taylor conceives critique as an ongoing process of retrieval, disclosure, and articulation of diverse goods that can orient collective practices. This study adopts a qualitative, analytical-hermeneutic approach to examine the critical function of goods within Taylor’s ethical framework, specifically from the perspective of ontological conflict. Accordingly, the analysis proceeds in three stages: first, by presenting Taylor’s broad conception of ethics as shaped by historically co-constituted goods inextricably linked to the self; second, by examining the role of goods within an ontology of conflict as envisioned by Taylor; and third, by outlining the notion of immanent critique as an exercise in articulation – a central concept in his philosophy. In conclusion, critique is understood not only as a mode of evaluation and judgment, but also as a generative act capable of opening new possibilities for the mobilization of moral sources.
References
ABBEY, Ruth. Charles Taylor. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000.
BELL, Daniel. Communitarianism and its critics. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.
BERTEN, André; SILVEIRA, Pablo da; POURTOIS, Hervé (Eds.). Libéraux et communautariens. 2.ed. Paris: PUF, 2002.
CALHOUN, Craig; GAONKAR, Dilip Parameshwar; TAYLOR, Charles. Degenerations of democracy. Cambridge, Massachusetts, Harvard University Press, 2022.
LAITINEN, Arto. Strong evaluations without sources: on Charles Taylor's Philosophical Anthropology and Ethics. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter, 2008.
MULHALL, Stephen; SWIFT, Adam. Liberals and communitarians. 2.ed. Oxford: Blackwell, 1996.
RAWLS, John. Uma teoria da justiça. 3.ed. Trad. Álvaro de Vita. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2008.
RICOEUR, Paul. “Le fondamental et l’historique: note sur Sources of the Self, de Charles Taylor” in LAFOREST, Guy; LARA, Philippe de (Eds.). Laval: Éditions du Cerf, 1998. p. 19-34.
TAYLOR, Charles. A ética da autenticidade. Trad. Talyta Carvalho. São Paulo: É Realizações, 2011.
______. As fontes do self: A construção da identidade moderna. Trad. Adail U. Sobral e Dinah de A. Azevedo. São Paulo: Loyola, 1997.
______. “Interpretation and the sciences of man” in Philosophy and the human sciences. v. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.
______. Modern social imaginaries. Durham: Duke University Press, 2004.
______. “A política do reconhecimento” in Argumentos filosóficos. Trad. Adail U. Sobral. São Paulo: Loyola, 2000a. p. 241-274.
______. “Bens irredutivelmente sociais” in Argumentos filosóficos. Trad. Adail U. Sobral. São Paulo: Loyola, 2000b. p. 143-161.
______. “Propósitos entrelaçados: o debate liberal-comunitário” in Argumentos filosóficos. Trad. Adail U. Sobral. São Paulo: Loyola, 2000c. p. 197-220.
______. The language animal: the full shape of the human linguistic capacity. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2016.
______. Uma era secular. Trad. Nélio Schneider e Luiza Araújo. São Leopoldo: UNISINOS, 2010.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 PENSANDO - REVISTA DE FILOSOFIA

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.





















