Biofilm and clinical data between volunteers with self-ligating and conventional brackets: an observational study

Authors

  • Caroline Gabriela Gonçalves Universidade de Uberaba, Departamento de Odontologia. Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brasil
  • Laura Lopes Galdino Universidade de Uberaba, Departamento de Odontologia. Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brasil
  • Marcelo Sousa Gomes Unieuro, Departamento de Ortodontia. Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brasil
  • Vinicius Rangel Geraldo-Martins Universidade de Uberaba, Departamento de Odontologia. Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brasil
  • Maria Alice Nassif Rodrigues da Cunha Universidade de Uberaba, Departamento de Odontologia. Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brasil
  • Ruchele Nogueira Uberaba University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26694/repis.v9i1.4894

Keywords:

Biofilms, Orthodontic bracket, Dentistry

Abstract

Introduction:  Fixed orthodontic appliances can lead to enamel demineralization and gingival changes due to increased biofilm. Aim: To detect the presence of Prevotella intermedia, Tannerella forsythia, Streptococcus mutans, Scardovia wiggsiae, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Fusobacterium nucleatum, and Porphyromonas gingivalis in oral biofilm and presence of white spot lesions and gingivitis in users of self-ligating and conventional brackets. Design: This observational controlled study was conducted from January to December 2020. The participants used fixed orthodontic therapy for 6 months and were divided into a conventional and a self-ligating bracket group. The participants underwent clinical examination, and biofilm samples were collected from their lower incisors. Results: No differences were found in the bacteria detection between the groups (p>0.05). However, white spot lesions were more common in users of self-ligating brackets (p=0.019). There was no association between clinical data and the detection of any microorganism (p>0.05). The fluorescence intensity of A. actinomycetemcomitans was higher in self ligating brackets than in conventional brackets (p<0.05). Implications: The microbial diversit did not differ between the types of brackets; however, the presence of white spot lesions and the amount of A. actinomycetemcomitans were higher in patients with self-ligating brackets.

References

Parolo CCF, Arthur RA. Chapter 5.2: Oral Microbial Biofilms. Monogr Oral Sci [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2023 Jul 21];31:62-77. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1159/000530558

Diaz PI, Valm AM. Microbial Interactions in Oral Communities Mediate Emergent Biofilm Properties. J Dent Res [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2023 Jul 21];99(1):18-25. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034519880157

Miller DP, Fitzsimonds ZR, Lamont RJ. Metabolic Signaling and Spatial Interactions in the Oral Polymicrobial Community. J Dent Res [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2023 Jul 21];98(12):1308-1314. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034519866440

Jakubovics NS, Goodman SD, Mashburn-Warren L, Stafford GP, Cieplik F. The dental plaque biofilm matrix. Periodontol 2000 [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2023 Jul 21];86(1):32-56. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12361

Jarosz LM, Deng DM, van der Mei HC, Crielaard W, Krom BP. Streptococcus mutans competence-stimulating peptide inhibits Candida albicans hypha formation. Eukaryot Cell [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2023 Jul 21];8(11):1658-64. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1128/EC.00070-09

Kim SH, Choi DS, Jang I, Cha BK, Jost-Brinkmann PG, Song JS. Microbiologic changes in subgingival plaque before and during the early period of orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2023 Jul 21];82(2):254-60. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2319/030311-156.1

Ireland AJ, Soro V, Sprague SV, Harradine NW, Day C, Al-Anezi S, et al. The effects of different orthodontic appliances upon microbial communities. Orthod Craniofac Res [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2023 May 21];17(2):115-23. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12037

Naranjo AA, Triviño ML, Jaramillo A, Betancourth M, Botero JE. Changes in the subgingival microbiota and periodontal parameters before and 3 months after bracket placement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop [Internet]. 2006 [cited 2023 Sep 21];130(3):275.e17-22. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.10.022

Folco AA, Benítez-Rogé SC, Iglesias M, Calabrese D, Pelizardi C, Rosa A, et al. Gingival response in orthodontic patients: Comparative study between self-ligating and conventional brackets. Acta Odontol Latinoam [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2023 Jul 21];27(3):120-4. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1852-48342014000300004

Pérez-Chaparro PJ, Gonçalves C, Figueiredo LC, Faveri M, Lobão E, Tamashiro N, et al. Newly identified pathogens associated with periodontitis: a systematic review. J Dent Res [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2014 Sep 21];93(9):846-58. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034514542468

Davis M, Plonka AB, Fulks BA, Taylor KL, Bashutski J. Consequences of orthodontic treatment on periodontal health: Clinical and microbial effects. Seminars in Orthodontics [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2023 Sep 21];20(3):139-49. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-016-0308-7

Anhoury P, Nathanson D, Hughes CV, Socransky S, Feres M, Chou LL. Microbial profile on metallic and ceramic bracket materials. Angle Orthod [Internet]. 2002 [cited 2023 Jul 21];72(4):338-43. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1043/00033219(2002)072<0338:MPOMAC>2.0.CO;2

van Gastel J, Quirynen M, Teughels W, Coucke W, Carels C. Influence of bracket design on microbial and periodontal parameters in vivo. J Clin Periodontol [Internet]. 2007 [cited 2023 May 21];34(5):423-31. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/s1678-77572012000300011.

Arn ML, Dritsas K, Pandis N, Kloukos D. The effects of fixed orthodontic retainers on periodontal health: A systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2023 Feb 21];157(2):156-164.e17. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.10.010

Liu H, Sun J, Dong Y, Lu H, Zhou H, Hansen BF, Song X. Periodontal health and relative quantity of subgingival Porphyromonas gingivalis during orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2023 Jul 21];81(4):609-15. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2319/082310-352.1

Lee SM, Yoo SY, Kim HS, Kim KW, Yoon YJ, Lim SH, Shin HY, Kook JK. Prevalence of putative periodontopathogens in subgingival dental plaques from gingivitis lesions in Korean orthodontic patients. J Microbiol [Internet]. 2005 [cited 2023 Jun 21];43(3):260-5. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Joong-Ki-Kook/publication/299057848_Prevalence_of_putative_periodontopathogens_in_subgingival_dental_plaques_from_gingivitis_lesions_in_Korean_orthodontic_patients/links/5d97096f458515c1d3922c05/Prevalence-of-putative-periodontopathogens-in-subgingival-dental-plaques-from-gingivitis-lesions-in-Korean-orthodontic-patients.pdf

Lu H, Zhou HM, Song XB, Sun JL, Liu HY. Quantitative study of Porphyromonas gingivalis in subgingival plaques of orthodontic adults. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2023 Apr 21];28(2):166-9. Avaliable from: https://europepmc.org/article/med/20480660

Rego RO, Oliveira CA, dos Santos-Pinto A, Jordan SF, Zambon JJ, Cirelli JA, Haraszthy VI. Clinical and microbiological studies of children and adolescents receiving orthodontic treatment. Am J Dent [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2023 Dec 21];23(6):317-23. Avaliable from: https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/74530782/Clinical_and_microbiological_studies_of_20211111-29117-1b0hrou.pdf?1636646056=&response-content-disposition=inline%3B+filename%3DClinical_and_microbiological_studies_of.pdf&Expires=1696356520&Signature=bP6FMzX7JesYg0nwQO59zq2M7QjyJSJG-~KTZiZcdT5cx5DtmwGLNoLsuDoFuKOWX5Xb9jCPYnVIZ7OVcdDjDX6sbolWQ4CJV0znU9ooVtfqutww8WeacTRF6X36dVjr21enrR2~5E7eREdLl6kD2WxABYyEWxm-JXm4Un2OKvftp9xB13hlHjKjBhMq4J9XGCbO8tZUwXeEVvMkLMRQB3M-NOVXUPzoQgOeWscwltigzwdDZaoTy6OxGJ4QDLu2r4vasAUPOHlSQR46mOW9S986OohwTd4rEO3rr5bq3HbXcT~0f9IrFb-HndQpCx0iJ~b593Ndr0JqeDI76AeEWw__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAJLOHF5GGSLRBV4ZA

Guo R, Lin Y, Zheng Y, Li W. The microbial changes in subgingival plaques of orthodontic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials. BMC Oral Health [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2023 Jul 2];17(1):90. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-017-0378-1

Pan S, Liu Y, Si Y, Zhang Q, Wang L, Liu J, Wang C, Xiao S. Prevalence of fimA genotypes of Porphyromonas gingivalis in adolescent orthodontic patients. PLoS One[Internet]. 2017 [cited 2023 Nov 27];12(11):e0188420. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188420

Pellegrini P, Sauerwein R, Finlayson T, McLeod J, Covell DA Jr, Maier T, Machida CA. Plaque retention by self-ligating vs elastomeric orthodontic brackets: quantitative comparison of oral bacteria and detection with adenosine triphosphate-driven bioluminescence. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2023 Apr 21];135(4):426.e1-9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.12.002

Vanishree T, Panchmal GS, Shenoy R, Jodalli P, Sonde L, Kundapur N. Changes in the Oral Environment after Placement of Fixed Orthodontic Appliance for the Treatment of Malocclusion - a Descriptive Longitudinal Study. Oral Health Prev Dent [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2023 Jul 21];15(5):453-459. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3290/j.ohpd.a38776

Tufekci E, Dixon JS, Gunsolley JC, Lindauer SJ. Prevalence of white spot lesions during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. Angle Orthod [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2023 Mar 21];81(2):206-10. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2319/051710-262.1

Faltermeier A, Bürgers R, Rosentritt M. Bacterial adhesion of Streptococcus mutans to esthetic bracket materials. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop [Internet]. 2008 [cited 2023 Apr 21];133(4 Suppl):S99-103. Available form: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.03.024

van der Veen MH, Attin R, Schwestka-Polly R, Wiechmann D. Caries outcomes after orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances: do lingual brackets make a difference? Eur J Oral Sci. 2010 Jun;118(3):298-303. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.03.024

Lim BS, Lee SJ, Lee JW, Ahn SJ. Quantitative analysis of adhesion of cariogenic streptococci to orthodontic raw materials. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop [Internet]. 2008 [cited 2023 Jun 21];133(6):882-8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.07.027

Velliyagounder K, Ardeshna A, Koo J, Rhee M, Fine DH. The Microflora Diversity and Profiles in Dental Plaque Biofilms on Brackets and Tooth Surfaces of Orthodontic Patients. Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2023 Jul 21];53(3):183-188. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0301574219851

Torlakovic L, Klepac-Ceraj V, Ogaard B, Cotton SL, Paster BJ, Olsen I. Microbial community succession on developing lesions on human enamel. J Oral Microbiol [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2023 Jul 21];4. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3402/jom.v4i0.16125

Downes J, Mantzourani M, Beighton D, Hooper S, Wilson MJ, Nicholson A, Wade WG. Scardovia wiggsiae sp. nov., isolated from the human oral cavity and clinical material, and emended descriptions of the genus Scardovia and Scardovia inopinata. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2023 Jan 21];61(Pt 1):25-29. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.019752-0

Tanner AC, Kent RL Jr, Holgerson PL, Hughes CV, Loo CY, Kanasi E, Chalmers NI, Johansson I. Microbiota of severe early childhood caries before and after therapy. J Dent Res [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2023 Nov 21];90(11):1298-305. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034511421201

Tanner AC, Sonis AL, Lif Holgerson P, Starr JR, Nunez Y, Kressirer CA, Paster BJ, Johansson I. White-spot lesions and gingivitis microbiotas in orthodontic patients. J Dent Res [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2023 Sep 21];91(9):853-8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034512455031

Forsberg CM, Brattström V, Malmberg E, Nord CE. Ligature wires and elastomeric rings: two methods of ligation, and their association with microbial colonization of Streptococcus mutans and lactobacilli. Eur J Orthod [Internet]. 1991 [cited 2023 Oct 21];13(5):416-20. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/13.5.416

Cacciafesta V, Sfondrini MF, Ricciardi A, Scribante A, Klersy C, Auricchio F. Evaluation of friction of stainless steel and esthetic self-ligating brackets in various bracket-archwire combinations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop [Internet]. 2003 [cited 2023 Oct 21];124(4):395-402. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0889-5406(03)00504-3

Feres MFN, Vicioni-Marques F, Romano FL, Roscoe MG, Souza VM, Torneri AL, Bueno-Silva B. Streptococcus mutans adherence to conventional and self-ligating brackets: an in vitro study. Dental Press J Orthod [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2023 Dec 21];26(6):e212019. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.26.6.e212019.oar

Jung WS, Kim K, Cho S, Ahn SJ. Adhesion of periodontal pathogens to self-ligating orthodontic brackets: An in-vivo prospective study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2023 Sep 21];150(3):467-75. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.26.6.e212019.oar

Longoni JN, Lopes BMV, Freires IA, Dutra KL, Franco A, Paranhos LR. Self-ligating versus conventional metallic brackets on Streptococcus mutans retention: A systematic review. Eur J Dent [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2023 Dec 21];11(4):537-547. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4103/ejd.ejd_132_17

van Gastel J, Quirynen M, Teughels W, Pauwels M, Coucke W, Carels C. Microbial adhesion on different bracket types in vitro. Angle Orthod [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2023 Set 21];79(5):915-21. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2319/092908-507.1

Pejda S, Varga ML, Milosevic SA, Mestrovic S, Slaj M, Repic D, Bosnjak A. Clinical and microbiological parameters in patients with self-ligating and conventional brackets during early phase of orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2023 Jan 21];83(1):133-9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2319/010412-8.1

Warizgo DR, Gautama S, Ramadayanti SL, Ardani IGAW. Bacterial biofilm accumulation on self-ligating vs. elastomeric metal brackets: A review study. World J Adv Res and Rev [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2023 Dec 21];21(01):114–124. Available from: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.21.1.2727

Gomes-Filho IS, Trindade SC, Passos-Soares JS, et al. Clinical diagnosis criteria for periodontal disease: an update. J Dent Health Oral Disord Ther [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2023 Dec 21];9(5):354-356. Available from: https://doi.org/10.15406/jdhodt.2018.09.00408

Oaagard B. White spot lesions during orthodontic treatment: mechanisms and fluoride preventive aspects. Semin Orthodontics [Internet]. 2008 [cited 2023 Dec 21];14:183–93. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2008.03.003

Sun F, Ahmed A, Wang L, Dong M, Niu W. Comparison of oral microbiota in orthodontic patients and healthy individuals. Microb Pathog [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2023 Oct 21];123:473-477. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0882401017317187

Zhao M, Liu M, Chen W, Zhang H, Bai Y, Ren W. Salivary microbial changes during the first 6 months of orthodontic treatment. PeerJ [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2023 Dec 1];8:e10446. Available from: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10446

Calniceanu H, Stratul SI, Rusu D, Jianu A, Boariu M, Nica L, et al. Changes in clinical and microbiological parameters of the periodontium during initial stages of orthodontic movement in patients with treated severe periodontitis: A longitudinal site-level analysis. Exp Ther Med [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2023 Dec 21];20(6):199. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2020.9329

Thornberg MJ, Riolo CS, Bayirli B, Riolo ML, Van Tubergen EA, Kulbersh R. Periodontal pathogen levels in adolescents before, during, and after fixed orthodontic appliance therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2023 Jan 21];135(1):95-8. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0889540608009244

Paduano S, Cioffi I, Iodice G, Rapuano A, Silva R. Time efficiency of self-ligating vs conventional brackets in orthodontics: effect of appliances and ligating systems. Prog Orthod [Internet]. 2008 [cited 2023 Dec 21];9(2):74-80. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.02.057

Al-okbi MA, Kosyreva T, Katbeh I, Tuturov N, Voeykova O, Birukov A. Plaque deposition around conventional and self-ligating brackets in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment. Medical Science [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2023 Fev 21];26,ms44e2059. Available from: https://doi.org/10.54905/disssi/v26i120/ms44e2059

Gopalakrishnan U, Felicita S, Ronald B, Appavoo E, Patil S. Microbial Corrosion in Orthodontics. J Contemp Dent Pract [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2023 Jun 1];23(6):569-571. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36259293/

Baka ZM, Basciftci FA, Arslan U. Effects of 2 bracket and ligation types on plaque retention: a quantitative microbiologic analysis with real-time polymerase chain reaction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2023 Aug 21];144(2):260-7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.03.022

Garcez AS, Suzuki SS, Ribeiro MS, Mada EY, Freitas AZ, Suzuki H. Biofilm retention by 3 methods of ligation on orthodontic brackets: a microbiologic and optical coherence tomography analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2023 Oct 21];140(4):e193-8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.04.019

Row L, Repp MR, Kingsley K. Screening of a Pediatric and Adult Clinic Population for Caries Pathogen Scardovia wiggsiae. J Clin Pediatr Dent [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2023 Dec 21];40(6):438-444. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.04.019

Whiteley A, Kingsley K. Scardovia wiggsiae prevalence among adult and pediatric orthodontic and non-orthodontic patient populations. J Med Discov [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2023 Dec 21];2(4):jmd17034. Available from: https://doi.org/10.24262/jmd.2.4.17034

Polat Ö, Gökçelik A, Arman A, Arhun N. A comparison of white spot lesion formation between a self-ligating bracket and a conventional preadjusted straight wire bracket. World J Orthod [Internet]. 2008 [cited 2023 Dec 21];9(2):e46-50. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19641768/

Published

2024-04-25

How to Cite

Gonçalves, C. G. ., Galdino, L. L. ., Gomes, M. S. ., Geraldo-Martins, V. R. ., Cunha, M. A. N. R. da ., & Nogueira, R. (2024). Biofilm and clinical data between volunteers with self-ligating and conventional brackets: an observational study. Journal of Infection Prevention and Health, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.26694/repis.v9i1.4894